Chileans, climate change and the natural environment: An audience segmentation study

Main Article Content

Rodolfo Jorge Patricio Sapiains Arrué http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0366-5553
Gabriela Alejandra Azócar de la Cruz Ana María Ugarte Caviedes http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-3085
Javier Alberto Romero Hernández http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2129-0628

Resumen

Not much research has been carried out in Latin America on the human dimensions of climate change. An audience segmentation study was conducted in Chile to explore different perspectives about this issue, using data from a national survey (n=2170). Results showed most Chileans express high levels of concern and agree climate change is happening and caused mainly by human actions. On the contrary, differences were found on worldviews, behaviors, perceptions of control among other factors, allowing the identification of three groups: Pragmatics, Neoliberals and Environmentalists. These results can contribute to the design of more effective communication strategies to increase awareness and climate action. 

Article Details

Como citar
SAPIAINS ARRUÉ, Rodolfo Jorge Patricio et al. Chileans, climate change and the natural environment: An audience segmentation study. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, [S.l.], v. 28, p. 1-32, jun. 2021. ISSN 2448-5799. Disponible en: <https://convergencia.uaemex.mx/article/view/15794>. Fecha de acceso: 27 sep. 2021 doi: https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v28i0.15794.
Sección
Artículos

Citas

Ajzen, Icek (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, USA: Academic Press Elsevier Science.
Azócar, Gabriela et al. (2921), “Climate change perception, vulnerability, and readiness: inter-country variability and emerging patterns in Latin America”, in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11, USA: Springer Nature.
Bain, Paul et al. (2012), “Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers”, in Nature Climate Change, vol. 2, England: Nature Research.
Bergquist, Magnus (2020), “Most People Think They Are More Pro-Environmental than Others: A Demonstration of the Better-than-Average Effect in Perceived Pro-Environmental Behavioral Engagement”, in Basic and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 42, no. 1, USA: Taylor & Francis.
Bertoldo, Raquel et al. (2019), “Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change”, in Public Understanding of Science, vol. 28, no. 7, England: Sage.
Bolados, Paola (2016), “Conflictos socio-ambientales/territoriales y el surgimiento de identidades post neoliberales (Valparaíso-Chile)”, in Izquierdas, vol. 31, Chile: Ariadna Ediciones & Saint Petersburg State University.
Burck, Jan et al. (2019), Índice de Desempeño frente al Cambio Climático. Resultados 2020. Climate Action Network (CAN), Germanwatch and New Climate Institute. Available at: www.climate-change-performance-index.org [14th, December, 2020].
CADEM (2019), Encuesta Plaza Pública. Cuarta semana de Agosto – Estudio n°293. Available at: https://www.cadem.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Track-PP-293-Agosto-S4-VF.pdf [16th, December, 2020].
Cook, John et al. (2016), “Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming”, in Environmental Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 4, England: Institute of Physics.
Cook, John et al. (2013), “Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature”, in Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, England: Institute of Physics.
Corner, Adam et al. (2012), “Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation”, in Climatic Change, vol. 114, Netherlands: Springer.
Criteria (2018), Agenda ciudadana criteria. Available at: https://www.criteria.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Agenda-Agosto2018.pdf [16th, December, 2020].
Defensoría de la Niñez (2020), Estudio de opinión niños, niñas y adolescentes 2019. Levantamiento en hogares. Available at: https://www.defensorianinez.cl/home-adulto/estudios-y-estadisticas/ [26th, August, 2020].
Detenber, Benjamin et al. (2016), “Audience Segmentation for Campaign Design: Addressing Climate Change in Singapore”, in International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, USA: University of Southern California.
Dunlap, Riley and Van Liere, Kent (1978), “The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measur- ing instrument and preliminary results”, in Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 9, USA: Taylor & Francis.
Dunlap, Riley et al. (2000), “Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale”, in Journal Social Issues, vol. 56, no. 3, USA: Wiley.
Gifford, Robert (2011), “The Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation”, in American Psychologist, vol. 66, no. 4, USA: American Psychological Association.
Gifford, Robert et al. (2011), “Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions”, in WIREs Climate Change, vol. 2, no. 6, England: Wiley.
Global Carbon Proyect (2018), Global carbon atlas. Available at: http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions [26th, August, 2020].
Hair, Joseph et al. (2013), Multivariate data analysis, Scotland: Pearson.
Hansmann, Ralf and Steimer, Nora (2017), “Subjective reasons for littering: A self-serving attribution bias as justification process in an environmental behaviour model”, in Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, vol. 73, no.1, Lituania: Kaunas University of Technology (KTU)
Heath, Yuko and Gifford, Robert (2006), “Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation: The Case of Belief in Global Climate Change”, in Environment and Behavior, vol. 38, no. 1, USA: Sage.
Hine, Donald et al. (2013) “Identifying climate change interpretive communities in a large Australian simple”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 36, England: Academic Press.
Hornsey, Matthew et al. (2016), “Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change”, in Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, England: Nature Research.
Howell, Rachel (2016), “It’s not (just) ‘the environment, stupid!’ Values, motivations, and routes to engagement of people adopting lower-carbon lifestyles”, in Global Environmental Change, vol. 23, no. 1, England: Elsevier Academic Press.
Howell, Rachel et al. (2016), “Impacts of adaptation and responsibility framings on attitudes towards climate change mitigation”, in Climatic Change, vol. 136, Netherlands: Springer.
INDH Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos (2018), Mapa de conflictos socioambientales en Chile. Available at: https://mapaconflictos.indh.cl/#/ [26, August, 2020].
INE Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (2005), “Clasificación socioeconómica de hogares de Chile”, in Enfoque estadístico, Chile: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.
INE Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (2016), Encuesta Nacional de Empleo 2016. Available at: http://webanterior.ine.cl/estadisticas/laborales/ene [26th, August, 2020].
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Switzerland: Geneva.
Kahan, Dan et al. (2012), “The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks”, in Nature Climate Change, vol. 2, England: Nature Research.
King, Ronald (2015), Cluster Analysis and Data Mining: An Introduction, USA: Mercury Learning and Information.
Kriss, Peter et al. (2011), “Behind the veil of ignorance: Self-serving bias in climate change negotiations”, in Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6, no. 7, USA: Society for Judgment and Decision Making.
Lawson, Danielle et al. (2019), “Children can foster climate change concern among their parents”, in Nature Climate Change, vol. 9, England: Nature Research.
Leiserowitz, Anthony et al. (2015), Global Warming’s Six Americas, March 2015, USA: Yale University and George Mason University.
Leviston, Zoe et al. (2014), Fourth annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: Interim report, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
Leviston, Zoe et al. (2015), Australian attitudes to climate change and adaptation: 2010-2014, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
Maibach, Edward et al. (2011), “Identifying Like-Minded Audiences for Global Warming Public Engagement Campaigns: An Audience Segmentation Analysis and Tool Development”, in PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 3, USA: Public Library Science.
Maillet, Antoine and Albala, Adrián (2018), “Conflictos socioambientales en los proyectos eléctricos en Chile (2005-2016): Un análisis configuracional”, in América Latina Hoy, vol. 79, Spain: Universidad de Salamanca.
Marlon, Jennifer et al. (2019), Yale Climate Opinion Maps. U.S. 2019. Available at: https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us/ [26th, August, 2020].
MacCright, Aron et al. (2015), “Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union”, in Environmental Politics, vol. 25, England: Taylor & Francis.
Metag, Julian et al. (2015), “Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information”, in Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), vol. 26, no. 4, England: Sage.
Mirkin, Boris (2013), Clustering: a data recovery approach, USA: Taylor & Francis.
Moulian, Tomás (1997), Chile actual: Anatomía de un mito, Chile: LOM-Arcis.
Nash, Nick et al. (2019), “Reflecting on Behavioral Spillover in Context: How Do Behavioral Motivations and Awareness Catalyze Other Environmentally Responsible Actions in Brazil, China, and Denmark?”, in Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, Switzerland: Frontiers Media.
Newman, Todd et al. (2018), “Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes”, in Public Understanding of Science, vol. 27, no. 8, England: Sage.
Newman, Nic et al. (2020), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf [16th, December, 2020].
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] and UN ECLAC [United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean] (2016), OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Chile 2016, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.
Oficina de Cambio Climático (2014), Plan Nacional de Adaptación al Cambio Climático, Chile: Ministerio del Medio Ambiente.
Pasek, Josh (2018), “It’s not my consensus: Motivated reasoning and the sources of scientific illiteracy”, in Public Understanding of Science, vol. 27, no. 7, England: Sage.
Pew Research Center (2015), Global Concern about Climate Change, broad support for limiting emissions. November. Available at: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/11/Pew-Research-Center-Climate-Change-Report-FINAL-November-5-2015.pdf [16th, December, 2020].
Poortinga, Wouter and Darnton, Andrew (2016), “Segmenting for sustainability: The development of a sustainability segmentation model from a Welsh sample”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 45, England: Academic Press.
Ruiz, Carlos (2019), La política en el neoliberalismo. Experiencias latinoamericanas, Chile: LOM.
Sapiains, Rodolfo et al. (2017), Encuesta Nacional de Medio Ambiente y Cambio Climático. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, CONICYT y CR2. Available at: http://www.cr2.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ENMA-Informe-2.pdf [16, December, 2020].
Scannell, Leila and Gifford, Robert (2013), “Personally Relevant Climate Change: The Role of Place Attachment and Local Versus Global Message Framing in Engagement”, in Environment and Behavior, vol. 45, no. 1, USA: Sage.
Sherley, Chris et al. (2014), “Using Segmentation and Prototyping in Engaging Politically-Salient Climate-Change Household Segments”, in Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector marketing, vol. 26, USA: Taylor & Francis.
Stern, Paul et al. (1999), “A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of envi- ronmentalism”, in Human Ecology Review, vol. 6, no. 2, Australia: Anu Press.
Stern, Paul et al. (1995), “Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects”, in Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 25, USA: Wiley.
Schwartz, Shalom (1977), “Normative influences on altruism”, in Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 10, no. 1, USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Whitmarsh, Lorraine (2009), “Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 29, England: Academic Press.
Whitmarsh, Lorraine (2011), “Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time”, in Global Environmental Change, vol. 21, England: Elsevier.
World Bank (2020), CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) - Latin America & Caribbean. Data.worldbank.org. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?end=2014&locations=ZJ&most_recent_value_desc=true&start=1960&view=chart [26th, August, 2020].